mirror of
https://github.com/86Box/86Box.git
synced 2026-02-21 17:15:32 -07:00
fix some warnings
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1367,6 +1367,7 @@ static void
|
||||
epoch_misc_out(uint16_t port, uint8_t val, void *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
epoch_t *epoch = (epoch_t *) priv;
|
||||
pit_intf_t *pit_intf = &pit_devs[0];
|
||||
|
||||
// dev->regs[port & 0x0007] = val;
|
||||
// epoch_log("%04X:%04X I/O Out %02X: %02X\n AX=%04X BX=%04X CX=%04X DX=%04X ES=%04X DI=%04X DS=%04X SI=%04X\n",
|
||||
@@ -1376,7 +1377,6 @@ epoch_misc_out(uint16_t port, uint8_t val, void *priv)
|
||||
|
||||
switch (port) {
|
||||
case 0x44:
|
||||
pit_intf_t *pit_intf = &pit_devs[0];
|
||||
for (uint8_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
||||
pit_intf->set_gate(pit_intf->data, i, val & 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1459,26 +1459,22 @@ kbd_epoch_poll(void *priv)
|
||||
static void
|
||||
kbd_epoch_adddata_process(uint16_t val, void (*adddata)(uint16_t val))
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint8_t num_lock = 0;
|
||||
uint8_t shift_states = 0;
|
||||
// uint8_t num_lock = 0;
|
||||
// uint8_t shift_states = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!adddata)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
keyboard_get_states(NULL, &num_lock, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
shift_states = keyboard_get_shift() & STATE_LSHIFT;
|
||||
// keyboard_get_states(NULL, &num_lock, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
// shift_states = keyboard_get_shift() & STATE_LSHIFT;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If NumLock is on, invert the left shift state so we can always check for
|
||||
the the same way flag being set (and with NumLock on that then means it
|
||||
is actually *NOT* set). */
|
||||
if (num_lock)
|
||||
shift_states ^= STATE_LSHIFT;
|
||||
// /* If NumLock is on, invert the left shift state so we can always check for
|
||||
// the the same way flag being set (and with NumLock on that then means it
|
||||
// is actually *NOT* set). */
|
||||
// if (num_lock)
|
||||
// shift_states ^= STATE_LSHIFT;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (val) {
|
||||
default:
|
||||
adddata(val);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
adddata(val);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user