BUG20515: rework way TCP window updates are calculated and sent
This commit is contained in:
@@ -383,6 +383,33 @@ tcp_listen_with_backlog(struct tcp_pcb *pcb, u8_t backlog)
|
||||
return (struct tcp_pcb *)lpcb;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Update the state that tracks the available window space to advertise.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns how much extra window would be advertised if we sent an
|
||||
* update now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
u32_t tcp_update_rcv_ann_wnd(struct tcp_pcb *pcb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32_t new_right_edge = pcb->rcv_nxt + pcb->rcv_wnd;
|
||||
|
||||
if (TCP_SEQ_GEQ(new_right_edge, pcb->rcv_ann_right_edge + pcb->mss)) {
|
||||
/* we can advertise more window */
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_wnd = pcb->rcv_wnd;
|
||||
return new_right_edge - pcb->rcv_ann_right_edge;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (TCP_SEQ_GT(pcb->rcv_nxt, pcb->rcv_ann_right_edge)) {
|
||||
/* Can happen due to other end sending out of advertised window,
|
||||
* but within actual available (but not yet advertised) window */
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_wnd = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* keep the right edge of window constant */
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_wnd = pcb->rcv_ann_right_edge - pcb->rcv_nxt;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* This function should be called by the application when it has
|
||||
* processed the data. The purpose is to advertise a larger window
|
||||
@@ -394,40 +421,20 @@ tcp_listen_with_backlog(struct tcp_pcb *pcb, u8_t backlog)
|
||||
void
|
||||
tcp_recved(struct tcp_pcb *pcb, u16_t len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((u32_t)pcb->rcv_wnd + len > TCP_WND) {
|
||||
pcb->rcv_wnd = TCP_WND;
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_wnd = TCP_WND;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
pcb->rcv_wnd += len;
|
||||
if (pcb->rcv_wnd >= pcb->mss) {
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_wnd = pcb->rcv_wnd;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
int wnd_inflation;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(pcb->flags & TF_ACK_DELAY) &&
|
||||
!(pcb->flags & TF_ACK_NOW)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We send an ACK here (if one is not already pending, hence
|
||||
* the above tests) as tcp_recved() implies that the application
|
||||
* has processed some data, and so we can open the receiver's
|
||||
* window to allow more to be transmitted. This could result in
|
||||
* two ACKs being sent for each received packet in some limited cases
|
||||
* (where the application is only receiving data, and is slow to
|
||||
* process it) but it is necessary to guarantee that the sender can
|
||||
* continue to transmit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tcp_ack(pcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (pcb->flags & TF_ACK_DELAY && pcb->rcv_wnd >= TCP_WND/2) {
|
||||
/* If we can send a window update such that there is a full
|
||||
* segment available in the window, do so now. This is sort of
|
||||
* nagle-like in its goals, and tries to hit a compromise between
|
||||
* sending acks each time the window is updated, and only sending
|
||||
* window updates when a timer expires. The "threshold" used
|
||||
* above (currently TCP_WND/2) can be tuned to be more or less
|
||||
* aggressive */
|
||||
pcb->rcv_wnd += len;
|
||||
if (pcb->rcv_wnd > TCP_WND)
|
||||
pcb->rcv_wnd = TCP_WND;
|
||||
|
||||
wnd_inflation = tcp_update_rcv_ann_wnd(pcb);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the change in the right edge of window is significant (default
|
||||
* watermark is TCP_WND/2), then send an explicit update now.
|
||||
* Otherwise wait for a packet to be sent in the normal course of
|
||||
* events (or more window to be available later) */
|
||||
if (wnd_inflation >= TCP_WND_UPDATE_THRESHOLD)
|
||||
tcp_ack_now(pcb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LWIP_DEBUGF(TCP_DEBUG, ("tcp_recved: recveived %"U16_F" bytes, wnd %"U16_F" (%"U16_F").\n",
|
||||
len, pcb->rcv_wnd, TCP_WND - pcb->rcv_wnd));
|
||||
@@ -510,6 +517,7 @@ tcp_connect(struct tcp_pcb *pcb, struct ip_addr *ipaddr, u16_t port,
|
||||
pcb->snd_lbb = iss - 1;
|
||||
pcb->rcv_wnd = TCP_WND;
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_wnd = TCP_WND;
|
||||
pcb->rcv_ann_right_edge = pcb->rcv_nxt;
|
||||
pcb->snd_wnd = TCP_WND;
|
||||
/* As initial send MSS, we use TCP_MSS but limit it to 536.
|
||||
The send MSS is updated when an MSS option is received. */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user